<?xml version="1.0"?><!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "/project/take/software/searchbench_offline_processing/paperxml_generator/aclextractor/src/python/../resource/dtd/paperxml.dtd"><article><header><firstpageheader><page local="1" global="304"/><title>Briefly Noted</title></firstpageheader><frontmatter><p><b>Briefly Noted</b></p><p><b>An Introduction to Natural Language Processing through Prolog</b></p><p><b>Clive Matthews</b></p><p>(University of East Anglia)</p><p>London: Longman (Learning about language series, edited by Geoffrey Leech and Mick Short), 1998, xi+306 pp; paperbound, ISBN 0-582-06622-0, £17.99</p></frontmatter><abstract>It may seem unusual for the author of a di­rectly competing textbook (Covington 1994) to review this one—but in fact the compe­tition is not head-on. My book introduces Prolog programmers to natural language, whereas this book introduces linguists to Prolog programming. As such, it helps solve the problem that there is no easy way for noncomputational linguists to get started in computing, and I may well use it in a course. The book covers most of Prolog but only a small and central part of computational lin­guistics, namely parsing. The first few chap­ters are a conventional introduction to Pro­log except that the examples are chosen to be of interest to linguists (e.g., databases list­ing what language is spoken where) and little background in formal logic is pre­sumed. Knowledge representation is intro­duced slowly to keep students from getting lost. The author demonstrates a sureness of touch derived, no doubt, from classroom ex­perience. Compared to another competitor (Dougherty 1994), Matthews focuses more on Prolog and on parsing in general rather than a specific linguistic theory. The only section that may go awry in the classroom is that on structured ob­jects (p. 61 ff.), where Prolog terms like language(uk) and queen(england) are de­scribed as involving "functions." Students are likely to think they are functions that return values—that queen(england) evalu­ates to something identifying the Queen of England. It does not; it's just a data struc­ture with queen in the functor position and england in the argument position. I find that I have to emphasize this in the classroom. Still, this is only a small part of an other­wise fine presentation, and it may be that Matthews can steer his students clear of this misunderstanding. The latter part of the book introduces tran­sition networks, DCGs, and (briefly) left- corner and chart parsing. The presentation is clear but, of course, is not a complete course in computational linguistics. (Neither is my book or Dougherty's.) But it is enough to get students started, and it is probably as much as those without previous programming ex­perience can be expected to absorb in a sin­gle course.—<i>Michael A. Covington, University of Georgia</i> </abstract></header><body><section title="References"><p>Covington, Michael A. 1994. <i>Natural Language Processing for Prolog Programmers. </i>Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.</p><p>Dougherty, Ray C. 1994. <i>Natural Language Computing: An English Generative Grammar in Prolog. </i>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.</p></section><section title="Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing"></section><section title="Ruslan Mitkov and Nicolas Nicolov (editors)"><p>(University of Wolverhampton and Univer­sity of Edinburgh) "This volume brings together revised ver­sions of a selection of papers presented at the First International Conference on 'Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing' (RANLP'95) held in Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria, presented at RANLP'95 we have selected the [32] best for this book, in the hope that they reflect the most significant and promising trends (and successful results) in NLP."— <i>From the editors' preface</i></p><doubt alpha="62.0" length="150" tooSmall="False" monospace="0.0">Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company (Current issues in linguistic theory, volume 136), 1997, xi+474 pp; hardbound, ISBN 1-55619-591-5, $99.00</doubt><doubt alpha="52.4" length="42" tooSmall="False" monospace="0.0">14-16 September 1995____From the 48 papers</doubt></section></body></article>